Wednesday, August 26, 2009

Media support for Rebiya Kadeer


The Australian media has a romance with freedom fighters. Perhaps it descended from our worshopping of our folklore heroes such as Ned Kelly.

It explains easily, the fascination with Uighur activist Rebiya Kadeer during her recent visit. When it comes to Kadeer versus China, a David and Goliath tussle, the media easily took on the side of David. Of course China is an easy target for criticisms; there are lots of issues that one could find fault with.

However, if only the media would look deeper into Kadeer’s background, especially in relation to her claims that she was no separatist, a claim that the local media seemed to swallow so readily. For China, separatism is a threat akin to treason.

The respected New York Times had no reason to hide her background. It published a photo of her in her Washington office with the flag of East Turkistan Independence movement prominently displayed behind her (NYT, 9 July 2009). (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/09/world/asia/09kadeer.html?_r=1&scp=10&sq=rebiya%20kadeer&st=cse)
It also reported that according to Rohan Gunaratna, an expert on international terrorism, the ETIM is linked to the Al Qaida and had members fighting for them on both sides of the Chinese border. (http://roomfordebate.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/08/what-should-china-do-about-the-uighurs/?scp=3&sq=Uighurs&st=cse)

Gunaratna is no stranger to the local Australian media and yet when it comes to comments on Kadeer, they chose to ignore him.

Tuesday, August 25, 2009

Defending China

It is amazing how common it is for one to set one standard for others and another for oneself. Gerald Henderson criticised Prof Don Russell ('No Need to be concerned about China's feelings" 25 Aug 09 http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/no-need-to-be-concerned-about-hurting-chinas-feelings-20090824-ewg6.html?page=-1) for asserting, apparently without evidence, that China's arrest of Stern Hu was justifiable for he engaged in bribery.

Henderson conveniently forgets he was also asserting that China had arrested Hu without reasons.

Prof Russell can rest on his past records, can Henderson, knowing his past biases ?