Tuesday, August 05, 2008

Brunei

We had a short trip to Brunei. I was curious about a place that has an absolute monarch, no income tax and friendly to Singapore.

It was as expected a quiet and tidy place with little signs of ostentatious wealth apart from what we were told the Sultan bought (the 100-odd Rolls Royces) and built (the Palace and the Mosque). We had few complaints from the local Bruneians. Who would, with free education and health services?

It is a place forgotten by the world, or perhaps ignored. No demonstrators (locals or overseas busybodies) to protest about anything.



Tuesday, June 03, 2008

John Macarthur would be proud !

When the Camden council blocked the building of a Muslim school in the fringe of the town, it inspired one hate activist Kate McCulloch to say that the well known Camden pioneer of the wool industry John Macarthur, would have been proud of them.

Well, she was wrong as far as the Macarthur descendants are concerned. They wrote in the Sydney Morning Herald of 31 May, 2008 :

“In two places in Saturday's Herald, Kate McCulloch was quoted as saying "The Macarthurs will be proud of us" ("Am I the new Pauline Hanson? I hope so", May 31-June 1). We write as direct descendants of John and Elizabeth's daughter Mary Isabella.

No one can say what their reaction would have been. But we can say that they were first-generation Australians who sought to continue to honour their cultural heritage in a new place and valued education for their children.

We can't know what Elizabeth and John would have thought, but we do know that Mrs McCulloch's racism is not representative of our own views and we like to think it would not have been representative of the Macarthurs either.

Hugh Finlay and Kate, James, Georgina and Isabella Macneil Woy Woy”

Descendants of John Macarthur, we take our hats off to you all !

Saturday, May 24, 2008

China - A Western Change of Heart ?

Give credit where credit is due, the media has suddenly decided that China is not such a bad place after all.

"China's soft heart" The Australian, 24 May 08
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23742593-28737,00.html

"Quake that changed a Nation", The Australian, 24 May 08
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23746659-28737,00.html

The change of tune was remarkable, as pointed by Jonathan Eyal of the Straits Times (24 May 08)

"ALTHOUGH few governments care to admit it publicly, Western nations are now re-evaluating their China policies.

The exercise may not result in radically different policies, but it could lead to a more nuanced approach towards Beijing in the months to come.
Relations between China and Western countries have seldom experienced so many ups and downs in such a short period of time. They reached a low ebb in March and April, when the Tibet riots led to unruly protests during the Olympic torch relay in London and Paris.

But then came the Sichuan earthquake, which revealed another face of China, that of a nation united in bereavement but ruled by a government determined to protect its citizens.

The intensity of the Sichuan rescue effort and the relative openness in reporting the disaster impressed Western public opinion.

Criticism of China stopped just as suddenly as it had begun, and the same Chinese leaders which a CNN journalist only recently dismissed as 'a bunch of goons', are now being regarded as heroes.

'Grandpa Wen' - as Chinese Prime Minister Wen Jiabao who directed much of the rescue effort came to be called - received almost as much adulatory coverage in the West as he did in his country's Internet chat rooms.
The difficulty of managing a relationship which now resembles a roller-coaster was evident this week, as the Dalai Lama, Tibet's exiled spiritual leader, continued his tour of Europe.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel - who last year received him with much pomp - was nowhere to be seen.

Meanwhile, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown arranged a meeting with the Dalai Lama on neutral grounds, rather than at his official residence.

'The Dalai Lama - An Inconvenient Guest' is how a British newspaper summed up the situation. There is a wide consensus in Western capitals that the old policy of publicly shaming China has not worked. But what troubles Western politicians most is the emergence of a new Chinese nationalism to which there seems to be no immediate answer.

Such nationalism was again in evidence this week when, immediately after the three-minute silence for the quake victims, ordinary people in Tiananmen Square erupted in chants of 'Go China, Go', the refrain made popular during the Olympic torch confrontations last month.

For many years, Western analysts dismissed China's surging national pride as just a by-product of official propaganda.

But now there is a growing realisation that this nationalist tendency is both genuine and permanent, and that it has assumed a clear anti-Western bent, which could start influencing China's foreign policy in the years to come.

What is to be done?

'We must persuade the Chinese people that justifiable pride in their country is perfectly compatible with friendship to the West,' mused a French diplomat during recent discussions on this topic.

In theory, that is clearly the best answer. But no Western country knows how to do it.

One practical outcome, however, is already evident: experts on Chinese nationalism are now being recruited by all Western governments. "

Friday, May 23, 2008

Expected use of the Mobile phone ?

It is almost amusing to read in the Australian (Rowan Callick, "Calamity transforms the face of China")

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23737501-25837,00.html

about how China could no longer hide their natural disasters because of the mobile network. Similar views have been expressed elsewhere in the Western media.

Perhaps they have forgotten that the mobile phone network was built by the Chinese government. Or are they implying that the Chinese government did not know what mobile phones could be used for until one day when the earthquake struck and it was too late ?

Wake up, Rowan, it is called the Information Age and technological progress.

Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Alternate Views on Tibet China

It is hard to find anything in support of China these days. Watching the TV one would easily conclude that it must have gone from the Sick Man of Asia to the Bad Boy of the World.

But are there alternative views on the matter of Tibet ? Plenty on China Daily online, but most people would simply disregard them out of hand.

Lately there are some articles from more respectable sources out of Europe and the USA. Such as

Whitbeck's "Hypocrisy over Tibet"

http://a-collection-of-articles.googlegroups.com/web/Whitbeck%20-%20Hypocrisy%20over%20Tibet.pdf?gda=9wBJjVcAAACF5i0uTJ6STiN5tcobIpz88kyVT50Y3v6UIEKEUPfrl-G2sVwGLF-i21hNBTL4y6MCqbA1vORZ0pcupp78DgrLRySewvC0CjnYqDSnY9uOb0xg22m2FwBFf91XlOZZeQ0&gsc=Pq7mwBYAAABysr6fRy-Go8PzxNP-0nJVA0pdQ4U5FOg87d5GlWLCNQ

Chossudovsky "Tibet Human Rights PsyOp"

http://a-collection-of-articles.googlegroups.com/web/Chossudovsky%20Tibet%20Human%20Rights%20PsyOp.pdf?gda=oTG-Q10AAACF5i0uTJ6STiN5tcobIpz88kyVT50Y3v6UIEKEUPfrl-G2sVwGLF-i21hNBTL4y6N40vP9HiJZN11QJ4XCus17wXKWGq1zaPJ2-NL5nPQXfs1M8pNy7OuaKy1lcv2vgI8&gsc=Pq7mwBYAAABysr6fRy-Go8PzxNP-0nJVA0pdQ4U5FOg87d5GlWLCNQ



A collection of such articles can be found at

http://groups.google.com.au/group/a-collection-of-articles/files?hl=en&upload=1

Red Flag waving Chinese alarmed Bob Brown

Green leader Bob Brown commented critically on the large number of Chinese Olympic supporters and the sea of red Chinese flags, associating them with Beijing’s Communism. Perhaps Bob Brown should be reminded that many people love their country and are proud to be hosts to the Olympics without necessarily endorsing the politics of their leaders. Certainly, many Australians who waved the Aussie flag and supported the Sydney Olympics were, like Brown himself, much against the politics of the then Prime Minister John Howard.

Monday, April 14, 2008

Tibet and the Olympics

Over the past weeks the mass media have reported extensively about the protests that were disrupting the Olympic Torch relay in Paris, London and San Francisco. The reports were overwhelming sympathetic to the Tibetan dissidents' cause. Unfortunately there have been little if any analysis of the facts surrounding the issue. (for an alternate view, see Stockwell's http://members.tripod.com/~journeyeast/myth_and_reality.html )

On Sunday 14 Apr 2008 thousands demonstrated in Sydney in protest against the media and in support of Tibet as an integral part of China. Perhaps confirming the claim of bias, the Sydney Morning Herald did not report the event, while the Australian Chinese Daily devoted an entire front page to it. Instead, the SMH had a lengthy article on the blog anger, an event largely ignored previously, perhaps only attracted to it after Singapare PM Lee Hsien Loong's recent speech on the subject. (http://www.straitstimes.com/STI/STIMEDIA/pdf/20080411/PMLEESPEECH.pdf)

Thursday, April 10, 2008

Multiculturalism Anyone?

Former Labor leader Mark Latham commented in his regular column in the Australian Financial Review recently that racism was behind the objections to the building of a mosque in Camden in western Sydney.

A reader commented quite curtly and perhaps cryptically (8 Apr 2008) -

Not an original comment and certainly not a constructive one. If so, what is the next step? As Kay rightly put it, (9 April 2008)




Perhaps Layton is one of those who does not want it to work.


Wednesday, March 19, 2008

Wednesday, March 12, 2008

Howard's Legacy?

A group of aboriginal youths was asked to leave a backpacker hotel in Alice Springs because of the colour of their skins. Apparently the excuse was that there was complaints from “Asian tourists”. Strange that tourists going to central Australia would object to facing real life aborigines.

Australians are known for their ability to stand up and speak out and even defy world opinion, such as with Kyoto and the refugees issue. Why is it when asked to commit as racist act the person responsible is so quick to comply? Well trained by John Howard, perhaps ?

Monday, December 31, 2007

SIEV X - Will it be just a memory ?

In October 2001, 353 asylum seekers drowned on the way to Australia. Questions remain on the involvement of the then Howard government which was determined to disrupt the flow of refugees into Australia. Why was the government so determined to prevent the disclosure of information regarding this "incident" ? What was the involvement of the Australian Federal Police ?

Even the construction of the memorial to the victims was discouraged. Today the "temporary" memorial still stands on the bank of Lake Burley Griffin in Canberra. It was a remarkable project created with the involvement of schools and other communities.




For a helicopter view of the site, click on the object below (sourced from Youtube). (Visit http://www.sievxmemorial.com/ )


Sunday, December 16, 2007

Hissy Howard

Letter in The Australian, 11 Dec 2007, in the aftermath of the Howard defeat -

Thursday, November 15, 2007

Not happy about John

Someone not happy with John Howard standing outside his campaign office in Eastwood demonstrating his displeasure.



Sunday, October 14, 2007

Howard's Transformation


This cartoon in the Weekend Australian of 13-14th October 2007 summarises it all . . .


Friday, October 12, 2007

Howard and the Aborigines

Speculations are rife as to the real reasons behind John Howard’s latest backflip – that over the status of the aborigines. For more than a decade he had resisted any kind of reconciliation and refused to provide a formal apology for past atrocities. Recently he even introduced draconian measures to deprive aboriginal communities of some basic rights. Then suddenly yesterday, he declared that the aborigines were deserving of special status in the Australian society and he would initiate a referendum to incorporate that in the Australian Constitution !

Some guessed that he had a true change of heart and perhaps was worried about his legacy in the face of imminent election defeat. Others believed he was pleading to more progressive constituents in his electorate so that he might snatch a win from the jaws of defeat.

There could be another reason. He might be attempting to create fear among his more ignorant constituents. By making a symbolic accommodation with the aborigines he might be indicating that Labor would be doing much more and therefore something to be fear for.